Yikes, modalists among us!

August 28th, 2010

A few weeks ago I taught about the Trinity in our Basic Theology group. As part of the discussion we covered a number of significant heresies that had dogged the church in its early days (200~500BC). These erroneous beliefs had been declared as heresy and put to rest by various church councils. At least that is what we thought about them. They were well outside of the foundational orthodoxy and heterodoxy of all of the orthodox church landscape. But the work of the evil one is persistent.

One of the key errors concerned the Trinity, and was known as Modalism.

Okay, so there I was visiting a local nursing home this afternoon. I was chatting with a lady, and in brief the significant part went something like this (with the small talk left out):

Me: Where are you from?

Her: The ….. (a Pacific Rim country)

Me: I have a number of friends from there. I know them from church. Are you a Christian?

Her: Yes

Me: Do you go do church?

Her: Back home I did, but not here.

Me: Oh, what church?

Her: The Church of the One God.

And then she added “We don’t believe in the Trinity.”

Well, I don’t know if she saw my ears perk up or the “Say what?” expression on my face but…

Without being too pushy, I trolled a bit more and realized that I was in the presence of a real, live Modalist! I was back in the early church era!

Folks, just to be clear, this is not squabbling about drums in the worship service. This is serious stuff that can affect the very grounds and sufficiency of the Gospel.

Now, admittedly, there are lots of people in today’s evangelical church who hold slightly Modalistic views without realizing it. They have never been exposed to the biblical truth (shame on their church and Pastors – but that is for another post some time later). For example, they regard the Holy Spirit as only an extension of God’s power, rather than a full person of the Godhead with the same being, power and authority as the Father and Son. This, however, appeared to be much more than that. This was flat out denial of the Trinity, period.

I am still somewhat in dis-belief.

I will certainly meet this lady again and I will plum the depths of this some more. At her relatively young age, it is most certainly a result of bad and heretical teaching, but it does show that there are large groups of people who have run seriously amuck and into dangerous territory.

The doctrinal wolves among the sheep indeed.

  • Share/Bookmark

What is the specific error?

August 10th, 2010

The local church in this case is saying that we choose Christ, triggering (that is, causing)  Him to appoint us to eternal life. There is not mention of any prerequisite work of the Spirit. This means that we are at some point in the process completely responsible for initiating our salvation and that we are capable of doing so as we stand. This is the error.

This vests the decision of who is save and who is not solely in the hands of a man, making him sovereign in initiating his ascension to eternal life. One can argue semantics but that is what they are saying.

Scripture, on the other hand, is unequivocal that the decision of who is to be save and who will believe is made solely by God BEFORE creation.

Further, Scripture makes it clear that man can NOT turn to Christ in his natural, unchanged state. Only the work of the Holy Spirit BEFOREHAND changes a man’s heart so that he can turn to Christ.

The Scriptural truth places the decision of who is saved, as well as how and when, solely in the hands of  God.  God is therefor solely and wholly sovereign in the ascension of the sinner to eternal life.

By take a ‘high view’ for man’s sovereignty, the belief under review demeans the sovereignty of the Creator. Man is conceived as not only sovereign over himself, but since his action causes God to act, God is in fact obligated to act on man’s behalf subsequent to the belief  ‘decision’.

Man is no longer the humble clay before the potter, but the sovereign clay who controls the potter’s action. This is a recipe for pride and hubris in man and for the believer to feel exalted in himself.

Once a believer casts himself  into this salvation creating role, the proper biblical attitude of obedience and acceptance toward God will surely evaporate over time. Man’s role will expand in significance to one assuming a God who is not omnipotent but limited.

This is an afront to and direct challenge to the God of the Bible. Throughout redemptive history, such attitudes have not been well received before the Lord…

  • Share/Bookmark

Subtle but dangerous error…

August 9th, 2010

I came across the quote below in the Doctrinal statement of an unnamed emergent church plant…

“When we put our faith in Christ, it triggers a spiritual chain reaction. We become the Temple of the Holy Spirit (I Cor. 6:19Open Link in New Window). Our names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life (Rev. 3:5Open Link in New Window).”

Sound pretty good? Appears to be based in Scripture? Looks can be deceiving. Please read it again.

It denies the foundational and critical sovereignty of God as clearly stated in the bible. Let’s see how…

Reducing their statement to the logic and intent we have  “When we put our faith in Christ, it triggers a spiritual chain reaction…Our names are written…”.

Action -> Result 1 and Result 2

You put our faith in Christ resulting in your inclusion in the Book of Life

I honestly can’ t see that anyone could interpret this any other way.

Well, to be blunt, that is wrong, wrong, wrong.

Let’s look at the truth of Scripture in Ephesians 1:4-6Open Link in New Window
“even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will” (italics mine)

Their statement stays that the believer was were chosen after they believed and because they decided to believe.

Scripture says that the believer was  chosen (and thus written in the Book of Life) before creation. These verses contain no caveats, individual conditions or other provisions for later causation.

These are two opposite positions, and they can’t both be correct. If the Bible is the sole statement of truth (Sola Scriptura), then this doctrinal statement is in error and at completely odds with Scripture.

So what? Next, we will examine why this is significant for all believers…

  • Share/Bookmark

All I can say is Yahoo!

August 5th, 2010

I should add that I am not endorsing all of his other preaching, but this message is good.

  • Share/Bookmark

Election does not bring complacency

July 31st, 2010

“[A Christian] does not make election his opiate and say, I am safe, O may sleep or wake as I please. He says, I am safely but this only makes me doubly vigilant that I may not dishonor Him who has saved me; and even though I may not finally fall away, I know no how much I may lose by one day’s slothfulness or how much I may gain by maintaining that watchful attitude to which, as the expectant of an absent Lord, I am called. ‘Blessed is he that watches,’ and even though I could not see the reason for this, I will act upon it that I may realize the promised blessedness. He who has called me to vigilance can make me partaker of its joy. He can make my watchtower, lonely and dark as it may seem, none other than the house of God and the very gate of Heaven.”

- Horatius Bonar from The Everlasting Righteousness


  • Share/Bookmark

Sound Doctrine

July 1st, 2010

I saw this image on the net and it needs sharing. It certainly expresses our desire to humbly seek and share the Truth of Scripture.

sound-doctrine

  • Share/Bookmark

Session 1 – Prologama

June 14th, 2010

We begin with an examination of our pre-suppositions, the lay of the land so to speak. These are some of the terms and concepts that we will need going forward.

- examine the basic terms (eg. theology, doctrine)
- what is theology
- what types of theology are there and why
- the justification for studying theology

Christian Beliefs – no reading required
Bible Doctrine – pages 1-32

Audio/Video – sorry none in place yet.

  • Share/Bookmark

Basic Theology @ TWN

June 14th, 2010

We are offering our first most formal seminar/course this Summer.

Basic Christian Doctrine aka Systematic Theology 101

A foundation examination of the doctrines defining essential Christianity, Orthodoxy and heterodoxy. The course is mainly aimed at Christian believers. The teaching is Reformed in theological flavour.

We will spend about one session on each doctrines, covering the material over 12-14 weeks.

Each session will be instructor lead with associated discussion. Additional optional discussion may be available locally on Friday evenings as part of our regular Colossisns 3:16 gatherings.

Text: Bible Doctrine by Dr. Wayne Grudem (ISBN 0310222338)
Optional substutute: Christian Beliefs by Dr. Wayne Grudem (ISBN 0310255996)

Since the sessions are is Wednesday evenings and a couple of people can not fit that in their schedules, we will be experimenting with recording the lecture portion in audio or possibly video for posting here. This would allow anyone who would find it profitable to ‘attend’.

It is an experiment. Our intent is to encourage and strengthen fellow believers and to glorify our Lord.

If you are a believer in Ottawa, Canada, and wish to attend, please email us.

  • Share/Bookmark

Seeker Friendly People – Beware!

March 29th, 2010

Anyone who has read this site, or more especially my ThoughtPaths site know my option of the seeker friendly, emergent church.

Last Summer (2009) I came across this clip by Rev. Al Martin. It was big hit at the White Horse North.

Enjoy and take heed…

  • Share/Bookmark

Luther didn’t wear a mask

October 31st, 2009

On October 31, roughly 492 years ago, when he brazenly tacked his 95 “points for discussion” to the church door, Martin Luther wasn’t wearing a mask or disguise.

Today is Halloween for most western countries (maybe eastern too) and at its root in 2009 it is a celebration of commercial sales and promotional success.  It will be feared by many in the Christian community, but the fear of the demonic is largely miss-directed towards the past when it should be directed toward the present dangers of the monetary idols that drive Halloween and similar events of the 21st century. Those are much more soul damming than what is focused upon in the past.

So, what about my opening statement?

Martin Luther did what he did not because he was trying to split or destroy the church but because he wanted to bring it back to the truth of Scripture. Division only occurred because the church could not turn back from its path away from the truth and into the world – a division that continues today.

Luther was driven by the work of the Spirit, showing him that all of the apparent means of salvation and sanctification available to him outside of the Word and Christ alone were not only insufficient, but potentially or presently corrupt – of the flesh not the Spirit.

He came to this state and his subsequent actions as himself, Martin Luther, plain and simple. All the rest that followed – reformer, crusader, divider et al – were by-products, and in terms of him, irrelevant.

If we are in the Beloved -  signed, sealed and delivered from before the foundations of the world (Ephesians 1:4Open Link in New Window) – then is it not our role also to come as ourselves? By that I mean that we stand, as Paul, for Christ and Him crucified, and nothing else, driven by the compulsion of the conviction given to us through a heart turned from the world by the work of the Spirit applying the grace of God. No props and no add-ons.

Yet in the reality of modern life, plans, actions, activities and such, we often stand for and present conviction in the things of the world. Some of those things may be wonderful things – church, family, good work – but they are not Christ and Him crucified alone. As such, they are completely irrelevant to our place in eternity and to the singular message which we are to champion.

Let us remain focused (even obsessed) with the only legitimate conviction, that of our faith in Christ and His truth in the Gospel, that we will be driven as Luther was, to the Word and its Truth beyond all else. Let us not wear a mask of the world as we walk in it.

And to Him be all the glory…

  • Share/Bookmark